Empower Orang Asli Women to Play an Active Role in Environmental Conservation

Published on 26 Oct 2021

Indigenous groups around the world are recognised as fundamental agents of change to achieve environmental conservation and sustainable development[1]. In Peninsular Malaysia, the Orang Asli (OA) constitutes 0.7% of the population or 178,197 persons of which approximately 80% inhabit rural and remote areas and live within or below the RM530 poverty line[2] [3]. As a result, the OA community is considered one of the most impoverished groups in Malaysia who are handicapped by a range of social and economic disadvantages.

The livelihoods of the OA hinge on available natural resources where men cultivate and women plant and gather food[4]. This way of life which depends heavily on the forest makes the preservation of the OA’s natural environment, much of which is their ancestorial lands, a matter in their best interest, leading to environmental sustainability. At the same time, ascribed gender roles are essential within OA communities as they are viewed as complementary, egalitarian[5], and offer distinctive perspectives on the significance of traditional knowledge in environmental awareness.

Sadly, existing policies and laws of land ordinances in Malaysia such as the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 have negatively impacted the OA community and the environment as it has efficaciously alienated the OA from the lands they live on and has enabled the local government to exploit these lands for economic gains. Only 1,536.38 hectares[6] of individual land titles have been granted to the OA for housing and agriculture purposes – a negligible number considering these lands are rightfully theirs!

Subsequently, OA women have become a liability in the pursuit of economic dominance and have less control and ability to inherit the land they occupy. Land ownership within their community is predominantly patrilineal, passed on from father to son[7], reducing opportunities of land ownership among OA women due to patriarchal social norms practiced within the community.

With environmental deterioration intensifying, OA communities are driven out of their land and are required to relocate to slums that are overcrowded with other destitute groups and which jeopardises personal security. Unfortunately, this reduces productivity and endangers the health and safety of OA women making them more susceptible to gender-based violence, such as rape and sexual harassment[8].

Despite OA women contributing extensively to the social, economic, and cultural life of their communities, they are often side-lined from environmental decision-making opportunities[9]. Consequently, OA men assert control over resources, and render the women defenceless against social and economic exploitation and gender-based violence, thus fortifying power imbalances and gender inequality.

Presently, there is an absence of policies in Malaysia that deliberate on the significance of gender perspectives among indigenous groups like the OA on environmental conservation[10]. Policies that exist to conserve the environment operate independently from OA women, impeding potential for optimal environmental conservation.


The Proposition

Malaysia has yet to ratify Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organisation which aims to secure, respect, protect and promote the rights of indigenous people which are currently being violated in response to land rights abuses and violence against women[11]. Consequently, this stresses the importance of gender perspectives in environmental conservation, generates opportunities in green growth sectors, and provides an important framework for strengthening dialogue specifically among OA women in environmental conservation decision-making processes.

Additionally, capacity-building training that employs the indigenous knowledge systems related to natural resource management can create a platform to empower OA women, increase productivity in environmental conservation efforts and provide them the much-needed opportunity to represent their community in active decision-making, policy reviews, reforms, and implementation.

Lastly, combining Malaysian social welfare schemes like the Suri Incentive (i-Suri) [12] with environmental initiatives such as ones to reduce single-use plastics (by reallocating the RM0.20 surcharge for plastic bags) has the potential to fund the welfare of OA women against gender-based violence and spur innovation and entrepreneurship through traditional knowledge and practices to conserve the environment.


The Way Forward

Existing environmental policies in Malaysia are technical, excessive, and have been designed in a gender-neutral manner. Such gaps need to be addressed to prompt the implementation of environmental conservation plans at the grassroots. Ultimately, to maximise these accomplishments in Peninsular Malaysia, it is vital for us to emphasise gender perspectives in modelling policies that assist OA women in environmental conservation efforts.



[1] United Nations Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues (UNOSAGI) (2010) Gender And Indigenous Peoples’ Environment. New York: United Nations.

[2] Department of Orang Asli Development (JAKOA) (2018) “Population Distribution of Orang Asli in Malaysia as of March 2018”, in W.A. Daud, A. Mohsin and M.S.A. Rahman, Land Ownership for Orang Asli in Malaysia: Current Situation (2020), p. 4998.

[3]  Masron,T., Masami, F. and Ismail, N. (2013) “Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia: population, spatial distribution and socio-economic condition”,  Journal of Ritsumeikan Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol 6(1): 75–115.

[4] Tan, V. (2019) “Malaysia’s indigenous tribes fight for ancestral land and rights in a modern world (01/09/2019)”, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/malaysia-orang-asli-ancestral-land-rights-11848294, date accessed 08/06/2021.

[5] United Nations Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues (UNOSAGI) (2010).

[6]  Daud, W.A., Mohsin, A. and Rahman, M.S. (2020) “Land Ownership for Orang Asli in Malaysia: Current Situation”, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, Vol 9(3): 4998-5002.

[7]  Irish Aid (2017) Environment and Gender Equality. Ireland: Department of Foreign Affairs.

[8] IUCN (2020) “Gender and the environment: What are the barriers to gender equality in sustainable ecosystem management? (23/01/2020)”, https://www.iucn.org/news/gender/202001/gender-and-environment-what-are-barriers-gender-equality-sustainable-ecosystem-management, date accessed 10/06/2021.

[9] International Labour Force (2017) Indigenous peoples and climate change: From victims to change agents through decent work. Geneva: International Labour Office.

[10] Bulan, R. (2010) “Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Participate in Decision Making in Malaysia”; paper presented for the International Expert Seminar on Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Participate in Decision Making, Thailand (20-22 January).

[11] Cultural Survival (2018) “Observations on the State of Indigenous Human Rights in Malaysia”; paper prepared for the 31st Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, New York (5-16 November).

[12] Bernama (2019) “DPM: i-Suri to be expanded to include Orang Asli, natives of Sabah and Sarawak (07/05/2019)”, https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/05/486325/dpm-i-suri-be-expanded-include-orang-asli-natives-sabah-and-sarawak, date accessed 11/06/2021.



26 Oct 2021


Sustainable Development